Springer paper: ChatGPT is bullshit
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5

Recently, there has been considerable interest in large language models: machine learning systems which produce human-like text and dialogue. Applications of these systems have been plagued by persistent inaccuracies in their output; these are often called 'AI hallucinations'. We argue that these falsehoods, and the overall activity of large language models, is better understood as bullshit in the sense explored by Frankfurt (On Bullshit, Princeton, 2005): the models are in an important way indifferent to the truth of their outputs. We distinguish two ways in which the models can be said to be bullshitters, and argue that they clearly meet at least one of these definitions. We further argue that describing AI misrepresentations as bullshit is both a more useful and more accurate way of predicting and discussing the behaviour of these systems.

We're in the brute force phase of AI - once it ends, demand for GPUs will too
https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/10/brute_force_ai_era_gartner/

Generative AI is, in short, being asked to solve problems it was not designed to solve.